Social Media engagement has become an obvious marketing platform, but it didn’t start out that way. Early Internet personalities gained a following basically by accident, by being themselves. At the time, there was no way for them to monetize their internet presence, but these people built more loyal followings than mainstream celebrities because they were authentic and relatable. Fans were there for them, not a role they played in a movie.
Influencers also often build an audience slowly, making the audience feel like they grew with them, like they “discovered them before they we’re famous”, which contributes to the loyalty of their audience. A study conducted by Alexander Schouten, Loes Janssen and Maegan Verspageet in June 2019 concluded that “influencers are deemed more trustworthy than celebrities, and that people feel more similar to influencers and identify more with them than celebrities. These processes, in turn, affect advertising effectiveness.”
(1)Though they may not have the name recognition that mainstream celebrities have, YouTubers and micro-influencers have much higher engagement rates on social media. On Instagram, Kim Kardashian has a 1.53% engagement rate and Ariana Grande has a 1.17% engagement rate, while fashion YouTuber Ashley from the channel bestdressed has a 27.3% engagement rate and TikToker Charli D’amelio has a 25.27% engagement rate.
Although Kim Kardasian has 175 million instagram followers and Charli D’Amelio has 20 million, their engagement rates bring the number of people that engage with one post to 2.7 million and 5 million respectively, making D’Amelio’s engagement almost twice that of Kardashian’s.
(2)The success of direct-to-consumer brands when compared to traditional corporations parallels that of the success of internet personalities. This grassroots feeling permeates a brand’s social media when social media is it’s main marketing platform from the beginning. Although brands like Glossier and Parade have less instagram followers than L’Oreal and Revlon, their engagement rates are much higher: Glossier at 1.74% and Parade at 2.71% compared to L’Oreal Paris at 0.15% and Revlon at 0.08%.
(3)This is partly because the young people who are their target audience are the ones on social media. But part of the appeal is an almost anti-establishment internet subculture that contrasts big corporations that pump out cheap product. As one of the most well known direct-to-consumer brands, Glossier demonstrates this well. Glossier’s slogan is to “democratize beauty”, and they have been successful in breaking down the image of the beauty industry as something intimidating and unattainable to something approachable and democratic. And those qualities are exactly what internet culture is all about; everyone gets to cast a vote with their follows, likes, and comments.
(4)That is why we decided that two of our deliverables would be social media accounts: an Instagram and a TikTok.* A following on Instagram is a good indicator for the success of a direct-to-consumer company, and even for other types of businesses, an instagram is now essential marketing tool.
TikTok however, is a platform not many brands have begun to use (even Glossier has not posted at all, though they do have an empty account). However scrolling through the explore page on Instagram, many of the videos are reposted TikToks. Currently, three years after TikTok’s launch, it has 800 million active monthly users. It took Instagram six years to reach that number. We believe it is only a matter of time before TikTok becomes a major marketing platform alongside Instagram.
*Due to the murder of George Floyd and the protests that have followed, we decided it was the wrong time to post this content to Instagram, at the risk of taking away from the educational material in people’s feeds. We have content prepared and would like to create these accounts at some point. If you would like to follow them, both our Instagram and TikTok handles are @mayo.skin.